SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A CANADIAN DIAMOND HUNT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: VAUGHN who wrote (578)1/9/2002 7:04:15 AM
From: VAUGHN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 930
 
Someone asked if I knew what the preferred colour of fancies was. I can't recall who and it may not have been on this thread so who ever it was, I appologize.

However, I found this which may be of interest:

google.com

[PDF] Diamonds
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... dia- monds are preferred to natural industrial ... present in a diamond. Most diamonds
have ... tinge of some colour (most often ... diamonds called "fancies" command very ...
www.nrcan.gc.ca/mms/cmy/content/1995/26.pdf - Similar pages
[ More results from www.nrcan.gc.ca ]

"Colour

The rarest and best colour in diamonds is no colour at all. The colour grade is a measure of the amount of colour present in a diamond. Most diamonds have a tinge of some colour (most often yellow or brown). Strong (intense)-coloured diamonds called “fancies” command very high prices. Among the fancies, the browns (cognac) are the most common, followed by champagne and intense canary yellow. Orange and yellowish greens are rare; pink, blue, and dark green are the rarest colours and command the highest prices.

Table 6 on pg. 14 has a coloured diamond price matrix. Two examples in this table are:

20.17 carrats Emerald cut Blue colour VS2 clarity $490,952 US per carrat

4.72 carrats Rectangular cut Pink colour VS1 clarity $140,400 per carrat

It should be noted that this NRCan report is dated 1994.

This link is very informative and colourful:

24carat.co.uk

This link has an interesting reference to the ratio of mined fancies to clear goods. You can appreciate the value implications.

diamondex.net

Regards

Vaughn



To: VAUGHN who wrote (578)1/9/2002 8:08:14 AM
From: jpthoma1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 930
 
Good morning VAUGHN,

Very interesting post. Here is what most trouble me:

On the Brodeur Peninsula of Baffin Island, 100 km east of Somerset Island, Twin Mining (TWG-T) has made an extraordinary find at its Jackson Inlet property. Numerous commercial-size gem stones were recovered from surface sampling of the Freightrain kimberlite body. What makes the find extraordinary -- even puzzling -- is that unlike the kimberlites being mined at Lac de Gras and elsewhere in the world, the Jackson Inlet diamonds are reported to differ in their "total absence of boart, rejections, coated and cubes, which are low-grade and low-yield diamonds." No explanation was given for this phenomenon, which is highly unusual, given current geological evidence on diamond distribution."

"The 86 stones were examined by Antwerp-based Diamond Trading N.V., which stated that Freightrain diamonds are "similar to high-quality South African diamonds, but without having their characteristic yellow colouring." In comparison, the Lac de Gras diamonds from the Ekati and Diavik projects are "generally octahedrons with higher occurrences of black piques [impurities] and maccles [intergrown diamond crystals]."

"Twin Mining has recovered a total of 869 stones to date, including microdiamonds, from limited surface sampling on Freightrain. Derbuch told The Northern Miner, during a recent site visit, that no boarts occur in the micros either, though there have been a few cubes. Derbuch also said there is definitely a bias toward larger stones.

Richard Roy, project manager and consultant, concurs that almost half of the +1-mm diamonds are greater than 2 mm. The percentage of large diamonds is unusual, almost double that of known producers in the world.

There also is an apparent gap in the plotting of the size distribution of the microdiamonds recovered last year. "There are two populations of diamonds,"

Davis explained, "either on an aggregate basis or an individual-sample basis.The micros don't match the macros. There has been a sampling of two sources [by the kimberlite]." He added that there is a population of small stones (up to the 0.6-mm size fraction) that are separated from a population of larger +1-mm stones by three size fractions where only a sparse number of diamonds have been recovered. While it is possible in a single kimberlite to find multiple populations of diamond sizes, it's unusual for the populations not to overlap."


But it reminds me of a very particular and unique «maars and diatrems» gold deposit found in some jungle somewhere on earth.

I know that nature is sometimes unpredictable. Two populations of diamonds!!!!!!

Now, you understand why I think an totally independant sampling and essaying protocol is necessary.

I will let you think about it (Don't be angry. Each and every possible cause must be examined!!!!!!).

;o)

Regards

JP