Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: semiconeng who wrote (154430)	1/9/2002 10:59:49 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"All I know is that the reports of P860 Yield issues are false. All I know is that intel's P4 AND P3 producing fabs are running at max, and intel still can't fill all the orders. All I know is that the mandatory/voluntary no pay time off for P3 Fabs announced near the beginning of Q4 was cancelled 1 week after it was announced. And I didn't say I THINK these things. I know them. Just can't say how." Exactly. You should be loaded with Intel.

To: semiconeng who wrote (154430)	1/9/2002 11:04:46 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Semi, <All I know is that the reports of P860 Yield issues are false> These AMDolts always spin a failure to meet unexpectedly high demand as "yield issues." Especially in 2000, these idiots will point to embarassments like the Pentium III 1.13 GHz fiasco as "proof" of their claims. Fortunately for everyone, such "yield issues" also led to record revenues for both companies, despite the execution slip-ups. Year 2000 is a great example. So be thankful when the AMDroids talk about "yield issues" at Intel. It's usually a good sign. Tenchusatsu

To: semiconeng who wrote (154430)	1/9/2002 11:20:03 AM
From: Charles Gryba	Respond to of 186894

semi, sounds good for Intel. Thanx for the input. C