SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (154528)1/9/2002 4:36:56 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
Z, <The only reference to this that I've seen in publication is the anecdote on the Inquirer of Intel engineers taking apart the Athlon and finding smaller gate lengths than one would expect on .18. Of course, they are Intel engineers, and also, we all know just how infallible the Inquirer is.>

AMD did it before when they intro'd Athlon. They used a hybrid 0.25/0.18u process to help boost the frequencies of the original Athlon, just before the real 0.18u Athlon was released.

We can assume AMD is doing the same thing, but this time with an 0.18/0.13u process. The only question is, will AMD do the same thing with an 0.13/0.09u hybrid process? Fin says they can't, but then again, we all know Fin is one of us no-good Intel-a-bees. ;-)

Tenchusatsu



To: SilentZ who wrote (154528)1/9/2002 5:36:32 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
All of the 'bees say that AMD has "shot its wad" with regards to .13, and all of the 'droids claim otherwise.

True but on the Intel side you have Ph.Ds, Process Engineers and other professionals with many years of semiconductor manufacturing experience. On the "Droid" side to have concrete contractors and screwdriver shop technicians acting as pundits. See the difference?

EP