SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (5436)1/10/2002 6:14:34 AM
From: Sig  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13815
 
<<<add this to that. Try not to get left behind. <g> Seriously, I'm just a simple trend follower. I try to not buy at the top of channels and sell when stocks move out of channel.
Re: taking profit I haven't done that willing yet since the bottom. I get stopped out after stocks fall out of their channels. >>>>
I've had to work hard and get support in order to take profits(too bullish). Overall I try take out and spend 1/3 of trading profits, which forces selling . I have three stocks that dont have a channel yet so I dont sell those.. Gnss was one but I am out now except for one call.

<<< re: BRCM
BRCM gaps all the time, very gappy stock. <g> I mention a month or so ago, that BRCM would have to make it over 50 and stay there, before I would commit new money to it. I stand by that statement still.>>>
Hope you are wrong -just got into a bit of Brcm yesterday
<<< re: CSCO and now DELL My market barometer, CSCO has been join by DELL. Both are bounce up against Dec. highs. We need them both to make a move through that area, so the market at large can move forward. >>>
I use Intc and Dell, which is about the same thing. And thats where a major war is playing out on the upper channels. Those bears are tough-with two years of experience. But bears must be getting real worried.Some day they will have to move those channels up. Could happen any day. Meanwhile IMO the bottom of the channels
has moved up- the top is the problem.
I have traded 100k in the last three days.
Sold actn,kkd,dcx,stor,tsco,gnss,topps,arba and plcm
Bgt Dell,bprx,brli,bmc,brcm.
Overall I can beat the Nas by a factor of 2 or 3.
While Nas is up +17%, I'm up 43%
HOWEVER the reverse is also true,so if the Nas drops I'm in doo doo fast when one of my key stocks also drops. Have to run for cover. Am much more nimble today than ever before. Donnie has lots of nimble, dont know anyone nimbler. Nimble is good.
Greg be nimble, Greg be quick
Greg jump over, Old Candlestick
Costco looking good and should help the market
Sig
smickandsmodoo.com
Chorus
:On the wings of a snow-white dove
Dow sends his pure sweet love
A sign from above
On the wings of a dove

I came to the market
With visions so fair
Of new homes and cars
And silk underwear

I thought it would be good
With money to burn,love
But I was mistaken
They started to churn

(chorus)
It was on a fine day
I'd started to fly
A margin call came in
And I said goodbye

To new homes and cars,love
And silk underwear
I'll take what is left
And go on elsewhere
(chorus)
Sig Stembol 1-9-02( for Freeus)



To: Boplicity who wrote (5436)1/10/2002 8:17:19 AM
From: Sig  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13815
 
We have a good chance to smoke some bears, break out the tops.
Wmt,plce,cmh,pir,psun,ann,jcp,acm all earnings up.
Go Loooooooooooooooooooooooongs
Sig
Dell up, Brcm up, Intc up .82



To: Boplicity who wrote (5436)1/10/2002 9:05:04 AM
From: David Weis  Respond to of 13815
 
LOL on not getting left behind.....I know that feeling. How many times in the past have I not been able to pull the trigger to buy? PLENTY!!!

Any thoughts on shorting CREE? Earnings come out after the close today:

briefing.com

I agree with your thoughts about CSCO and DELL needing to go to a higher high.

David



To: Boplicity who wrote (5436)1/11/2002 12:17:22 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 13815
 
Napster returns : Selection Severely Cut

Posted at 12:10 a.m. PST Thursday, Jan. 10, 2002
BY DAWN C. CHMIELEWSKI
Mercury News

Napster, the embattled music service that single-handedly sparked the Internet music-sharing revolution only to be shut down in July under legal pressure, returns today as a subscription music service.

The new, legitimate Napster goes live for a group of 20,000 testers, chosen from among 3 million users who volunteered to try the new service. The limited public test will continue until the paid service launches, a date that has not been announced.

Millions of people who used the file-swapping service will find a very different Napster from the one they remember. For one, the once-vast quantity of music available for sharing is severely reduced.

In its heyday, Napster surpassed any record store in breadth and depth of collection. It now lacks any major-label content. The 1,500 songs available for sharing come from a handful of independent labels, such as Orchard and Vitaminic, whose artists are hardly Billboard chart-toppers.

For the test, ``you can't expect too much,'' said Konrad Hilbers, Napster's chief executive, who joined founder Shawn Fanning in demonstrating the new service at the Consumer Electronics Show this week in Las Vegas.

Napster will have a tough time attracting the same number of users as before.

``They face the exact same challenges that every other service has,'' said P.J. McNealy, analyst at Gartner G2, a San Jose technology research firm. ``They need all five labels because the Napster brand isn't enough.''

---Striking deals---

Hilbers said Napster will eventually offer major-label content and is negotiating fresh licenses with all five major record labels. Napster struck an exclusive deal in June with MusicNet, one of two subscription music services launched by the major record labels. The deal with MusicNet would grant Napster access to music from three of the big five labels -- Warner Music, BMG and EMI -- together with powerful independent label Zomba music.

But the technology that RealNetworks, a partner in MusicNet, uses to prevent the music from being stolen is incompatible with Napster's own digital-rights management technology, which would force Napster subscribers to use two separate music players to hear their songs.

Hilbers is seeking to strike a separate deal with the labels that would create a more uniform music experience for Napster subscribers.

Since Napster's shutdown, the recording industry has tried to tap into the phenomenon that Napster started. Besides MusicNet, Sony, Vivendi Universal and EMI last month launched their own paid subscription service -- pressplay. A third service, Rhapsody, features offerings from smaller labels.

The labels have repeatedly said that before releasing popular tracks from, say, Britney Spears or 'N Sync, Napster must demonstrate it has gone legit -- and no longer contributes to the kind of widespread piracy that caused the labels to sue it for copyright infringement.

Napster Two will remain a peer-to-peer service, meaning one computer user can trade songs with another.

This time the underlying architecture is different.

Napster has rebuilt its network to incorporate digital-rights-management technology.

Before a song by an artist like the Dave Matthews Band can be swapped, Napster's acoustic-fingerprinting technology identifies it and determines whether it's something the service holds the rights to distribute.

Once cleared for digital distribution, the record label, artist or songwriter sets the rules governing whether the file will be shared as an unrestricted MP3 file -- or converted to a secure ``.nap'' format that locks the content on the PC. It can't be moved to a portable device or burned onto a CD.

---Glitches corrected---

Fanning said the new subscription service corrects some of the technical glitches from Napster's earlier days, automatically resuming the download of a file from another source if the transfer is interrupted. It offers a separate, detachable music player and better tools for organizing a digital music collection, by genre, album or artist.

And family members no longer have to share a single account. Now, they can create as many as four distinct user profiles.

In the tests over the next six to eight weeks, Napster is aiming to be able to support between 5,000 and 10,000 simultaneous users. When it launches the paid service, prices will range from $5 to $7 a month for 50 downloads, Hilbers said.

While stripped of its popular content, Napster retains true to its feisty, counterculture spirit.

Fanning said he hopes unsigned bands will continue to use the service as a forum to promote their music and build an audience, just as ``Dispatch'' did in the days before the band attracted the interest of major labels. ``It will hopefully enable them to make a living without taking their risks with a label,'' he said.

``This is the very essence of Napster,'' Fanning said.

www0.mercurycenter.com