SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (142872)1/10/2002 2:40:37 PM
From: oldirtybastard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I agree, I also think CSCO's share price action in the heyday sold many routers and switches for them...bay/nortel, xylan, and cabletron had better products in many areas. I would rather have sold other brands because they were better and easier to configure (CSCO's products were patched togehter from acquisitions and there was often not a uniform command line) but CSCO gear was much easier to sell, was often asked for specifically, probably because the it managers saw its chart on CNBS 17 times a day and all owned shares



To: GraceZ who wrote (142872)1/10/2002 2:43:40 PM
From: NOW  Respond to of 436258
 
say it isn't so....<G>



To: GraceZ who wrote (142872)1/10/2002 2:55:06 PM
From: JHP  Respond to of 436258
 
how did CSCO get there?
try 250% financing of deals!!!!!!!
which leads to today..same way LU,NT, etc got to this wonderful prone position..
<< one of the reasons Chambers doesn't have any
kind of idea where the business will be in the near future is that he isn't
at all clear how they got where they are now. >>


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News