Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (110687)	1/10/2002 9:02:49 PM
From: Kayaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Well you win dumbest thing ive read all year(well it is only jan so you have a chance) Hey if you want to be insulting, the dumbest thing I've heard all year is: I believe vistors should have the burden to prove their innocence, they are here as guest's. #reply-16828433 I'm confident that one will hold up for the rest of the year.

To: marginmike who wrote (110687)	1/11/2002 10:42:00 AM
From: Kayaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

IMHO if you didn't find a few stocks worth buying at the end of September, you ain't never gonna buy nothin'. Well you win dumbest thing ive read all year(well it is only jan so you have a chance). Even at the september lows most stocks and the indicies as a whole were trading 30% above mean value. The S&P is around 14 it is now arround 28, in september it might have been 18-20.... Late Sept-Oct 1st I found a few stocks worth buying: ATML @5.56, AMCC @6.47, JNPR @ 9.13. Whether or not they were worth buying is an empirical question which has been answered. Whatever model you had/have that says they weren't worth buying has been proven wrong. By the way, it would be nice to have a discussion and express an opinion without being insulted like that. If you want to make a point, consider sticking "IMHO" up front instead. And, as I pointed out, you're living in a glass house. I regret responding in kind.