SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (109)1/11/2002 3:35:24 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5185
 
Pompsander:

My statements were based on personal experience with 401k and pension plans. You are better informed about Enron, so I defer to you.



To: pompsander who wrote (109)1/11/2002 4:37:58 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 
"The point is, the enron decision on that plan DID harm the 401(k) participants by reducing their
other source of retirement income. When Enron stock tanked, both plans took massive hits. The DB plan, as I
undestand it, may not have enough assets to pay its promised benefits. If true, the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation will ensure the benefits, but up to certain limits. Long Term and older employees will get hit worst
because their account balances and accruals would be greater."

Thanks for the post.