Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greg s who wrote (154997)	1/12/2002 12:59:03 PM
From: whortso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "For others it may involve qualifying new products, or using Intel Tillamook versions of our current products, for the current application. Tillamook versions of most impacted products will be available before year end. " So once again Dan is wrong and AMD sent their embedded business to Intel. Whort

To: greg s who wrote (154997)	1/12/2002 1:18:56 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: (the K6-2E+ and K6-IIIE+) Replaced by the Elan series: Check the dates on the tech documents at amd.com Note that Intel apparently has completely exited the market for differentiated embedded X86 processors, offering instead their standard CPUs: intel.com; And AMD appears to be following Intel's exit from this market (actually, the whole market seems to be evaporating). I'm not sure what made a K6-IIIe different from a K6-III, or an embedded PIII different from a "regular" PIII - perhaps you can review the issue and give us all a summary. I'd agree that internally designed "embedded" versions of neither company's standard processors don't seem to be doing well lately, while the StrongArm Intel bought is a much more successful chip for embedded applications.