SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155015)1/12/2002 2:46:42 PM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Intel already has dual channels program.intel.com and cannot beat Athlon with a single channel. So I'm no sure you understand what you're saying.

Wanna writes:You seem eager to say "wait for dual channel", but if that's true, then Intel should benefit as well

developer.intel.com

inqst.com
Even with these impressive results, the performance potential of DDR is still not entirely exhausted. We already know that at least one vendor (nVidia for X-Box) plans to produce a high-speed 128-bit implementation of DDR main memory for desktop computing. Perhaps others will implement dual channel DDR (or 128-bit DDR) solutions as well. We have every reason to expect further performance improvements from such solutions.

Lets not forget nForce dual channel isnt' a true full channel for the CPU.



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155015)1/12/2002 2:49:56 PM
From: Charles Gryba  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
wbmw, yes, but AMD is a lot more castrated by the single channel than Intel is right now. So, the delta increase for AMD would be bigger than Intel's. The EV6 should be able to do 200FSB it was designed to do that from the very beginning.

C