Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rubicon Minerals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Miner who wrote (4)	1/13/2002 4:52:23 PM
From: Joey Two-Cents	Respond to of 470

John, I hadn't posted in over a year, and show up on the BAY thread in Mid-december. I was going to ask them their opinons but I didn't want to come across like I was pumping Rubicon to those guys. If/when they finalize the McFinley deal this month, I'll get their opinions on the deal. Rubicon owns so much acreage in Red Lake and now with this latest McFinley deal they've increased their odds of making a Goldcorp type discovery on one of their properties. I also believe the properties they own can provide gold profits even at $280 gold. I've spoken with Bill Cavalluzzo (PR at Rubicon)very knowledgable and competent. I've been using Rubicons lack of self promotion to pick up more shares and know that it's only a matter of time that the general market stumbles onto Rubicon.