Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Gryba who wrote (155206)	1/13/2002 5:29:04 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Constantine, Re: "So I suggest to you to post to your buddy Paul NOT to make silly posts about the Tbred not gaining enough from .13 and then pretend that the NWood gained so much from the .13 process." It looks like you missed the point Paul was trying to make. The top Northwood frequency at launch was 2.2GHz (a 10% increase over the top speed of Willamette), but the top expected Thoroughbred launch frequency is said to be 1.73GHz (which is only 3.6% over the top speed of Palomino). Not only that, but Northwood's next launch will be at 2.4GHz (20% over the top speed of Willamette), but the roadmap for Thoroughbred (according to Paul) says 1.8GHz (only 7.8% over the top speed of Palomino). Now, it's quite possible that Paul is wrong, and Thoroughbred reaches higher speeds, but if not, then Paul might be somewhat justified in gloating about Intel's better .13u process. Here's Paul's link again, in case you need to remind yourself what he said. Message 16899070 wbmw