Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Scott who wrote (27570)	1/13/2002 10:33:56 PM
From: ajtj99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Robert, if you are saying we can advance without a re-test of the Sept. lows, I am in disagreement with you. The fact that we did not re-test them in November or December means it will be an even more brutal drop. It would have been much easier to re-test them from 1800 than 2100. I am expecting two or three events this year in the COMP: A H&S drop to 1750 and / or a break of the rising wedge to 1646, and a re-test of the Sept. lows at around 1500 if successful.

To: Robert Scott who wrote (27570)	1/13/2002 10:54:31 PM
From: Joseph Silent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Nope - won't happen - never has in a situation like this Robert .... "never" means you are ascribing probability zero to an event for which we don't have a well-defined sample space, but only a handful of data points. Even if you do turn out to be right, the conclusion can't be. Isn't it a bit like saying we've never had an earthquake on a Monday so we won't have one next Monday? J :)