Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155319)	1/14/2002 11:24:26 AM
From: Charles Gryba	Respond to of 186894

wbmw, yes I am. Hammer has a shorter pipeline but it has SOI to make up for it so I think their scaling will be similar. C p.s. bookmarked!

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155319)	1/14/2002 11:25:41 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 186894

RE:" predicting that Hammer will reach the same frequencies of the Pentium 4. I think that's wishful thinking. It's not worth arguing, though. It was just a WAG on my part. I bookmarked your prediction - I hope you do the same for me. We can find out who's right by next year." Unless they redesigned Hammer, it won't reach the speeds of the P4. Hammer will have to rely on a PR rating. Then again, there IS NO Hammer. SO what's the argument. There is no .13u T-bred. SO why bother dissing it's scalability? All a bunch of FUD. The same was said when the Athlon moved from .25u to .18u and that process eventually got a 40% increase in clock. SO what. The T-bred still can't keep up with the Northwood. OTOH, can anyone explain why Paul is going berserk? It's starting to worry me about my Intel investment. Jim