Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.horn who wrote (18)	1/14/2002 6:15:12 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3602

There is a principle in law which allows an adverse inference to be drawn if evidence is destroyed....and that is what people do in real life too. They assume the worst....often even worse than what really happened....when documents are destroyed. I for one think that this should be the end of A as a company....it's a Firestone moment for them, and it's hard to see how any major corporate client is going to believe they have any integrity left after this. Once the defections of customers start, the talent leaves (gets poached by the other majors, taking more clients with them).

To: c.horn who wrote (18)	1/16/2002 5:08:59 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3602

I think it was the better of 2 evils for Anderson. What would get them in more hot water? Shreading the documents or having what was on them revealed? That kind of position is exactly what is wrong with this country. Ethics have gone right completely out the window in corporate America and the stock market. Whoever shredded those documents obstructed justice and belongs ion jail. I for one truly hope they are caught red-handed and punished. Thousands of bankrupted ENE employees who did nothing wrong except trust their dishonest employers already have been.