SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (68)1/14/2002 9:32:26 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
Assuming that Lay was crooked from the early days as you suggest, there is still nothing that indicates that GWB was involved in said crooked activities. *If* he was, then he should be hung by his nads, but the guilt by association approach does not hold water.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (68)1/14/2002 9:40:49 PM
From: Libbyt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
but the scammers were busy trying to get Bush elected governor at the time

If you were to look at almost every major corporation in America, you would find that most corporations donate to both Republican and Democratic campaigns.

IMO this is an accounting issue...not a political issue. Accounting, as in who was responsible for providing the information to Arthur Andersen. Was ENE not providing the correct information to Andersen, or was Arthur Andersen not providing an accurate account of the finances at ENE? IMO this has absolutely nothing to do with Bush.