Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (91)	1/14/2002 10:14:49 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3602

I don't doubt that ENE may have tried to buy off Bush and Cheney. But I doubt that the regulations that were passed or the tax bills put in place were designed for ENE's benefit WRT to the schemes. I have no doubt that Bush's energy policy was designed to help domestic energy businesses. And of course, ENE would benefit under this umbrella. But, it is also my opinion that an energy policy that benefitted domestic energy producers be put in place. If you play the game of "follow the money", it is hard to argue that ENE didn't thrive under Clinton's administration. Bush's policies have not had enough time to really make a difference one way or another, IMO. Why are you willing to look the other way when it is Clinton's policies (energy and otherwise) which allowed ENE to thrive?