Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (152)	1/15/2002 11:33:13 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 3602

Andersen's Policy Was To Destroy Audit Papers Tuesday, January 15, 2002; Page A10 The Washington Post At the Arthur Andersen accounting firm, destroying records related to the company's audit work was a matter of policy. Statements released by the firm yesterday said that "only essential information" should be kept and called for early drafts of documents to be "destroyed currently." As a general rule, Andersen policy said auditors' working papers should be kept for six years. Andersen made the release in response to news reports that a company lawyer had directed its employees to destroy all Enron Corp. audit documents except the most basic work papers. Andersen, which has acknowledged destroying Enron records, released an e-mail message sent Oct. 12, four days before Enron made the surprise announcement that it was losing money. The message, from lawyer Nancy Temple, said that it "might be useful to consider reminding the engagement team" of the policy. "It will be helpful to make sure that we have complied with the policy," the message continued. Andersen said Temple says she never told the audit team to destroy records of past audits. Deletion of electronic records was supposed to be done "in such a way that precludes the possibility of subsequent retrieval," the policy said. Andersen has said it retrieved some of the Enron records that were deleted. -- David S. Hilzenrath © 2002 The Washington Post Company

To: jlallen who wrote (152)	1/15/2002 2:57:36 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3602

Wow, lots of good pro-conservative data being posted at this thread: Subject 52241 (From which I've been banned for not being conservative enough) I especially enjoyed this novel little tidbit on the budgetary fraud of the Clinton Administration: >> 3. Paying Down Debt? - some claim the government ran a surplus the past 2 years and paid down debt, yet total federal debt increased $148 billion in those years - - meaning they ran an operating deficit of $148 billion. << More great stuff (Are the guys on that thread ALL Reaganites?): Message 16910528 Message 16910529 Message 16910534 Message 16910536 siliconinvestor.com