Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (155494)	1/15/2002 4:00:48 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

Ten, <Takes many many years of success to build up the hatred the Yanks and Intel have.> >>Or America, given the number of people out there (a minority, but still) who believe America deserved 9/11. Good point. That last one the hardest for Americans to understand, I would think. Tony

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (155494)	1/15/2002 4:05:47 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten, Itanium followers, Mike Magee got hold of a response by Compaq to Gartner's rather gloomy outlook for Compaq's conversion to Itanium, aka IPF. They are pretty far apart in their estimates for time and cost to convert. This is for the OpenVMS platform, currently on Alpha. Hope Compaq is more right than Gartner. theinquirer.net Tony Edit: one piece of shipping schedule of the OpenVMS platform by Compaq, on Itanium: Gartner assessment: What will be the target platforms for OpenVMS (e.g. Superdome/rp8400/L series, GS/ES/DS models, merged platform, other IPF systems based on Compaq Proliant, Blades, etc.)? Compaq response: Current Alpha roadmap remains; OpenVMS will ship on the Itanium-based systems available in the 2003/2004 timeframe. Early porting & testing will be done on the ProLiant Itanium platform. ProLiant has been the workhorse IA server line, 2 way to 8 way.