Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paul_philp who wrote (22140)	1/15/2002 6:20:40 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 99280

Chip equipment makers tumble on Intel spending plans By Daniel Sorid NEW YORK, Jan 15 (Reuters) - Makers of semiconductor equipment stumbled in after-hours trade after No. 1 chip maker Intel Corp. (NasdaqNM:INTC - news). said it planned to cut its capital spending budget 25 percent in 2002, below many analysts' expectations. Shares of Applied Materials Inc. (NasdaqNM:AMAT - news), the largest maker of equipment used to make microchips, dropped 6.4 percent in after-hours trading to $42.68 from $45.61 at the closing bell. Other decliners included KLA-Tencor Corp. (NasdaqNM:KLAC - news), which fell to $51.90 from $55.31, and Novellus Systems Inc. (NasdaqNM:NVLS - news), which fell to $39.70 from $42.31. Intel, whose capital spending accounts for about 20 percent of the entire industry's budget, reported capital spending in 2001 of $7.3 billion, money that was used to upgrade its factories to the latest chip-making technologies. In its report on fourth quarter earnings, Intel on Tuesday said it would spend $5.5 billion on capital spending in 2002, a 25 percent drop. ``We knew they were coming down, but that's really sharp,'' said Banc of America Securities analyst Mark FitzGerald. FitzGerald had forecast Intel would cut its spending to $6.5 billion. Chip makers suffered their worst-ever year in 2001 as spending on computers and other electronics lagged. In response, the industry spent about 35 percent less on capital equipment than during the boom year of 2000. Intel, however, went against the grain and actually raised its capital spending in 2001, to $7.3 billion from $6.7 billion in 2000. The increase came even as Intel's revenues dropped 21 percent in 2001. Wall Street expected a drop in Intel's capital spending this year, but not as severe a drop as Intel made evident on Tuesday. The consensus estimate was in the low-to-mid $6 billion range, said Merrill Lynch analyst Brett Hodess. The drop in chip equipment makers' stock prices comes after a big run-up since September. The Philadelphia Stock Exchange semiconductor index (^SOXX - news), a measure of both chip makers and chip equipment makers, is up about 60 percent since the end of September, when stocks collapsed following the September 11 attacks. Goldman Sachs analyst James Covello said investors had been buying chip equipment stocks on hopes that a recovery in the semiconductor sector would come sooner rather than later. Intel's cut in spending will put a damper on the optimism of some investors. ``This may be what they need to sort of reset the expectations.'' biz.yahoo.com

To: paul_philp who wrote (22140)	1/15/2002 7:59:13 PM
From: Paxb2u	Respond to of 99280

Paul, I agree

To: paul_philp who wrote (22140)	1/16/2002 8:12:38 AM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Respond to of 99280

Earnings are so beat up that even a minor uptick makes it easy to beat expectations Yes, except even that pathetic standard wasn't met. Lost in the Don't Worry Be Happy PR was the little fact that JNPR went from a decent little profit to a nice little loss. And let's face it, this time last year we were already in a downturn so you even have the supposed benefit of an easy compare. That said, of all the hundreds of box makers out there, JNPR is the only one likely to have much of a future.