Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (143970)	1/15/2002 6:25:12 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

A friggin' idjit....

To: yard_man who wrote (143970)	1/15/2002 6:53:40 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<It does not hold any information about where Intel thinks demand is going,'' Osha said. ``The capital spending that this company has set is a result of roadmaps set a long time in advance.>> TRANSLATION: Osha told his boss and clients that cap ex would stay up, they've held on to all their shares, keep the price up until they can dump 'em, willya! Seems to me, when we were looking at INTC's cap spending projections 2 and 3 quarters ago, the bulls were trumpeting the fact that they didn't cut cap ex, so semi equipment cos were in "recovery" (yeah, just like that delinquent alcoholic cousin of yer's, whose been in rehab 12 times!). Now that cap ex is taking the pipe, he's saying "we don't care cap ex no more?" Yeah, whatever, Nevermind....<G>