SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (206)1/15/2002 6:51:16 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 3602
 
so
Enron could be bringing Andersen down and could be hurting some financial institutions with their failure.

Who will Andersen's hardship affect? Who will they bring down?

Could we have the makings of a domino effect?



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (206)1/15/2002 9:14:25 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3602
 
Enron is fully bloated.

What shocked me was that Enron was on the NYSE and not the Bulletin Boards. When it's all over they may still be trading with Pink Sheets.

It is quite paramount that auditors become independent of management.Enron was paying Andersen several million dollars a year. That's alot of incentive to keep the contract lucid. What a grease job.

They took "pump and dump" to a new level.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News