SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (155578)1/15/2002 7:13:01 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony, Re: "Paul O. said the answer was the same, with and without the X-Box being considered (market share?)."

That probably means that X-BOX volumes were small compared to total volumes. Paul also claimed that Intel set a new record in terms of CPU shipments, which was in the low double-digits growth from the last quarter. Intel sold around 28M CPUs last quarter, and a 12% increase would give them 31.3M units. (Is that a new record?) Paul also expected about a 1-2% gain in market share, meaning that they expect AMD unit shipments to be between 7.8M and 8.3M units. If AMD announces much more than 8.3M, then Intel would have lost market share last quarter. I can believe AMD could announce things as having gone either way tomorrow, but I wouldn't take a gain in market share by AMD as bad news for Intel. It seems that both companies had a great fourth quarter.

wbmw



To: Tony Viola who wrote (155578)1/15/2002 7:22:24 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"Paul O. said the answer was the same, with and without the X-Box being considered (market share?)."

He said what answer was the same? That Intel gained share? If he said that he dodged the question...and Intel did include them. I hope the analysts didn't catch it.

Jim



To: Tony Viola who wrote (155578)1/15/2002 7:30:34 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony,

For the first time in years, I couldn't listen to the CC. Can you characterize the tone, of Intel, and the analysts? Better or worse than the past?

Thanks, if you have the time...

John