Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (155594)	1/15/2002 8:03:45 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John, if you look back, I think you'll see that AMD's revenues sagged worse than Intel's at the low points, so AMD is improving from a lower base. This is the type of thing you might expect, i.e., the smaller company having lower dips but higher comebacks. Like Otellini said in the CC, Xeon sales are improving a lot, but they are coming up from a pretty low level. Tony

To: Petz who wrote (155594)	1/15/2002 8:12:56 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Petz, Re: "Intel underperformed again." Forgive me for saying so, but you seem pretty sour about Intel's successful quarter. Aren't you happy enough that AMD is going to deliver some great news tomorrow? Are you that big of a grinch that you have to rain on the Intel parade? You AMDroids ought to concentrate more on AMD, since they are still set to lose money for the year (although I'm sure that record CPU volumes and potential gains in market share would be more than enough consolation for any AMDroid investing in AMD's future). wbmw P.S. Congratulations in advance just in case AMD does show an increase in market share tomorrow. I am thinking that this will be a definite possibility for them, despite what Paul Otellini said during the CC. All they need is about 8.5M units.