SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (155613)1/15/2002 9:41:33 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
How Intel Got Its Groove Back

By Tish Williams
Senior Writer
01/15/2002 08:06 PM EST

Intel posted a robust $7 billion in revenue, surpassing optimistic Wall Street forecasts of $6.85 billion and blowing by the numbers from its own midquarter update, when it reported fourth-quarter earnings after the market closed Tuesday.


The chipmaker earned 7 cents a share, according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Deducting $550 million in acquisition-related costs, Intel achieved a pro forma profit of 15 cents a share, topping Wall Street analyst consensus projections of a profit of 11 cents a share, as gathered by Multex.com.

Chip-equipment companies won't join the celebration, however, after Intel lopped 25% off its capital spending plans in moving from 2001 to 2002. The goliath will spend only $5.5 billion on equipment in the coming year, compared with $7.3 billion in 2001.

Equipment provider Applied Materials (AMAT:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) dropped 6.5% in after-hours trading, while smaller cohorts Novellus Systems (NVLS:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) and KLA-Tencor (KLAC:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) shed 6% on the news, according to Instinet.

After weeks of hints of a stronger-than-expected holiday season, Intel's strong quarter shed the first light on the PC market, including a 7% sequential revenue boost from the third quarter's $6.5 billion and a 50% improvement in pro forma earnings.

Nonetheless, Intel's results were a far cry from 2000's fourth quarter $8.7 billion in revenue and 38-cents-a-share pro forma profit, which came at the front end of what has become a slump of several quarters in the computer business.

Investors will be pleased with Intel's first-quarter forecast, which details a wide range of $6.4 billion to $7 billion in revenue, reflecting the continued uncertainty in the chip business and the economy.

According to Multex.com, analysts were predicting $6.5 billion in revenue in the first quarter for the chip leader. CFO Andy Bryant explained during a Tuesday afternoon conference call that Intel has suffered from flat to down revenues sequentially during its first quarter in each of the past five years, and said that a 5% drop would be normal. Yet Bryant is leery of ruling out macroeconomic impacts that could push revenue higher or lower.

Intel fell 16 cents during Tuesday trading, closing at $34.68.

The chip giant updated its fourth-quarter forecast on Dec. 6, raising revenue estimates from an original range of $6.2 billion to $6.8 billion to heights of $6.7 billion to $6.9 billion. Intel remarked that it was seeing some seasonality in the fourth quarter -- which usually lifts revenue up more than 10% as holiday shoppers wrap up PCs.

More consumers than expected may have bought PCs in the December quarter, but critical signs of a revival of corporate spending have yet to surface.

Paul Otellini, general manager of Intel's Achitecture Group, said that Intel is still waiting for Fortune 500 customers to loosen their wallets. "There has been no large-scale evidence of that at this point," he lamented.

Gross margins leapt from the 47% Intel predicted during its midquarter update to 51.3%, which Intel attributed to higher unit shipments and lowered spending on manufacturing. Average selling prices for Intel's chips were not the engine behind the growth as they, instead, fell sequentially.

The market is prepared for Intel to rapidly increase the amount it makes per chip once the newer Pentium 4 microprocessors fully replace the older Pentium 3 chips in the marketplace. Intel expects Pentium 4's will represent 50% of chip shipments by mid-2002, and reported that the new chip represented about 40% of worldwide microprocessor sales in the fourth quarter.

Then again, Intel warned during its midquarter update that investors should not expect significant gains in average selling prices in the fourth quarter, acknowledging that it was having trouble keeping up with Pentium 4 demand for that quarter.

Intel predicted that in the first quarter gross margins would settle back to 50%, give or take a few percentage points. Otellini said that Intel still would be grappling with the supply of Pentium 4 chips at times during the first quarter, but that it would satisfy overall demands.

Short End of the Stick
Intel's equipment suppliers got the dreary portion of the news, as expected, when Intel slashed its capital spending budget for 2002 by 25% to $5.5 billion. Intel said 50% of the $5.5 billion would purchase equipment -- it emphasized a move to 300 mm and 0.13 micron technologies -- with 33% to be spent on construction. That would eliminate almost $1 billion from Intel's coffers for equipment buys. The chipmaker doled out $7.3 billion in 2001 on capital equipment, just short of its $7.5 billion plans.

Some experts predicted before Tuesday that Intel would cut as much as 40% out of its budget. While a 25% cut is steep, it was widely believed that Intel's historically huge spending in 2001, compounded by a harrowing fall-off in business, would combine for more drastic cuts to its capex budget for 2002. At the same time, Intel will raise its research and development spending from $3.8 billion in 2001 to $4.1 billion, to fuel product development.

In 2001, other chip powerhouses such as Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM:NYSE ADR - news - commentary - research - analysis) and Texas Instruments (TXN:NYSE - news - commentary - research - analysis) dramatically scaled back equipment outlays, while Intel consistently maintained its $7.5 billion budget.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (155613)1/15/2002 11:50:50 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, do you hear from Scumbria at all?

ted