SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Palau who wrote (218970)1/16/2002 7:25:58 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 769670
 
Dem-Enron scandal heats up - looks like Dems did favors for Enron in return for campaign cash - the same old pattern of Dem corruption that was the central theme of the Clinton regime.

Clinton rented the Lincoln bedroom to and had many meetings with Enron where personal lobbying took place. There should be a vigorous investigation and prosecution if any illegal deals were made between the Dems and Enron:

Enron gave cash to Democrats, sought pact help
By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Enron Corp. donated $420,000 to Democrats over a three-year period while heavily lobbying the Clinton administration to expedite passage of a 1997 global warming treaty that would have dramatically increased the firm's sales of natural gas. Top Stories

Federal and confidential corporate records show that after donating thousands of dollars in soft money and PAC donations beginning in 1995, Enron received easy access to President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore.

In one meeting, Enron Chairman Kenneth L. Lay met Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore in the Oval Office, during which the Enron boss was asked for input on a pending international energy conference in Kyoto, Japan.

The fallout from Enron's failure continued yesterday as Arthur Andersen LLP fired its lead Enron auditor after finding that he ordered the destruction of "thousands of e-mails" and other documents sought by Securities and Exchange Commission investigators.

The "expedited" document-shredding, ordered by David B. Duncan, started Oct. 23, a few days after the SEC first asked the firm for information about Enron. It continued until Nov. 9, the day after Andersen received an SEC subpoena for documents.

During their term in office, Clinton administration officials, mainly from the Energy Department and the Environmental Protection Agency, often made themselves available for Enron executives to discuss the firm's needs, according to records, even arranging for meetings with key congressional staffers.

The records surfaced this week amid questions by Democrats on whether meetings Enron executives later had with the Bush administration were improper based on campaign donations by the firm to Republicans, although no evidence has surfaced to show that Bush officials did anything to help the company.

Executives for the Houston-based energy giant, which filed for bankruptcy Dec. 2, sought help from the Clinton administration in an effort to give the firm the ability to buy and sell trading credits to emit carbon dioxide as part of a strategy to reduce greenhouse gases.

The new system would have encouraged new investments in gas-fired plants and pipelines and curtailed the use of coal-fired power plants, which emit more carbon dioxide. Natural gas, electricity and their delivery systems constitute Enron's major businesses.

During the July 1997 White House meeting, Mr. Lay personally lobbied Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore to support a "market-based" approach to what he described as the problem of global warming, an Enron economic strategy that a December 1997 private internal memo said would be "good for Enron stock!!"

The memo, written by Enron executive John Palmisano, said the Kyoto treaty — later signed by Mr. Clinton and leaders of 166 other countries, but never ratified by the Senate — "would do more to promote Enron's business than will almost any other regulatory initiative outside of restructuring the energy and natural gas industries in Europe and the United States."

In an August 1997 memo by Mr. Lay to all Enron employees, the chairman said Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore had "solicited" his view on how to address the issue of global warning "in advance of a climate treaty to be negotiated at an international conference."

That memo said Mr. Clinton agreed a market-based solution, such as emissions trading, was the answer to reducing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The Kyoto treaty calls for industrial nations to reduce emissions by 2012 to 5.2 percent below 1990 levels. Mr. Clinton never presented the treaty to the Senate for ratification because of congressional opposition.

On Aug. 15, 1997, the Senate voted 95-0 for a resolution setting parameters for climate negotiations, saying U.S. diplomats should not negotiate a climate treaty in which poor countries have fewer commitments than the United States and other developed countries. The Senate vote guaranteed that the treaty would not be ratified.

Despite the Senate decision, Enron continued to push the Clinton administration well into 1998 for what the company called a "restructuring" of legislation that would have been a "first step to solving the problems of global climate change." The firm, according to the records, sought laws that would have favored Enron's natural gas inventory and reduced competition from coal.

During a Feb. 20, 1998, meeting with Energy Secretary Federico Pena, Mr. Lay encouraged the Clinton administration to seek electricity legislation favored by Enron, outlining for the secretary what the company believed were the "important" pending legislative concerns.

"Today's meeting between Ken Lay and Energy Secretary Federico Pena to discuss electricity legislation went very well," said the memo written by Jeff Keller, the firm's Washington governmental affairs chief.

"Secretary Pena indicated that the White House proposed bill is 'on the president's desk,' and that Clinton could be convinced to release the White House proposal in the next few days," Mr. Keller said. "He suggested that President Clinton might be motivated by some key contacts from important constituents."

Mr. Lay took that advice and sent a letter to Mr. Clinton that day, asking him to "move this matter forward."

Clinton administration officials have denied any wrongdoing, saying they were only responding to constituent requests.

Enron's attorney, Robert S. Bennett, yesterday defended the firm, saying it was "again the victim" of existing campaign finance laws.

"It's the old problem of campaign finance," Mr. Bennett said. "If you're accepting money, you're doing constituency service. If your enemy is accepting money, it's buying influence."

In 1994, the Washington-based Export-Import Bank approved a $302 million loan toward a $3 billion Enron-controlled power plant in India. Mr. Clinton took an interest in the deal, asking the U.S. ambassador to that country and his former chief of staff, Thomas F. "Mack" McLarty, then a presidential adviser, to monitor the proposal.

Mr. McLarty — who later became a paid Enron director — spoke with Mr. Lay on several occasions about the plant. In 1996, four days before India granted approval for Enron's project, the Houston-based firm contributed $100,000 to the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation of Enron to determine if company executives illegally blocked employees from selling billions of dollars in plummeting shares from their 401(k) retirement accounts. The probe also has focused on accusations that the executives cashed out their stock while hiding massive losses.

After Mr. Bush announced in February that he opposed regulation of carbon dioxide emissions and would abandon the Kyoto accord, Enron was among several companies that vigorously urged him to salvage at least parts of the pact. When a number of European nations joined in, Mr. Bush created a task force headed by Vice President Richard B. Cheney to study counterproposals.

The administration is said to support the creation of a voluntary system that sets incentives and targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions. The Bush plan is expected to include an emissions trading system, help to power plants that improves their equipment, and protection for farms and forests that absorb greenhouse gases.

The White House has said Mr. Cheney met with Enron representatives to discuss the administration's energy policy once, with his aides doing the same on five other occasions. The meetings included one session just before Enron made the largest corporate bankruptcy protection filing in U.S. history.

There is no evidence Mr. Cheney or others, including Commerce Secretary Donald L. Evans and Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill, with whom Mr. Lay also spoke, did anything for Enron, and Mr. Bush has pledged to aggressively pursue the Enron investigation.

Mr. Lay is a longtime Bush campaign supporter and the Enron executive met twice last year with the president, although both men said they did not discuss Enron's problems and have not spoken since about them. Federal records show he was a member of the Bush presidential campaign's Pioneer Club, one of 214 persons who each raised $100,000 for the race. Mr. Lay was the top campaign contributor to Mr. Bush's 2000 presidential campaign.

As a member of the Pioneer Club, Mr. Lay sent a letter to several hundred people, many of them Enron executives, urging them to make the maximum contribution to Mr. Bush's campaign. "In no way is this a condition of employment or continued employment at Enron," the letter said. Within three months, Enron executives had donated more than $50,000 to the Bush campaign.
washtimes.com

Robert Rubin will also have to be investigated - seems his calls to the Treasury seeking help for Enron are raising serious questions - his Citigroup may have to return the millions they got Enron to deliver to them. Looks like the Dem was shafting the little guys again.



To: Mr. Palau who wrote (218970)1/16/2002 7:36:18 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Lieberman asked to quit investigation over his huge financial ties with firms involved in Dem-Enron scandal - Dems refuse call for ethical conduct:

Lieberman urged to quit Enron probe over cash ties
By Dave Boyer
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

A government watchdog group yesterday asked Democratic Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman to quit a politically charged investigation of Enron Corp. because he and his New Democrat Network have received more than $250,000 in campaign donations from firms with ties to the case.

Citigroup Inc., the largest creditor of Enron in the bankruptcy action, is Mr. Lieberman's single biggest campaign contributor since 1997, with $112,000 in donations. It gave an additional $100,000 last year alone to the New Democrat Network that Mr. Lieberman founded, according to Federal Election Commission records.

The campaign donation disclosures highlight the political risks in the Enron investigations for congressional Democrats, who are eager to publicize the Bush administration's ties to the Texas-based energy company.

Although Enron gave generously to the Bush campaign and to congressional Republicans, Democrats are not immune to charges of influence peddling. Enron also donated $25,000 to Mr. Lieberman's New Democrats in 2000, records show.

Those donations create potential conflicts of interest that should disqualify Mr. Lieberman from leading a congressional probe of the collapsed energy firm, the Fairfax-based National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) told the senator in a letter.

"To assure the public of the integrity of the Senate investigation and to avoid the appearance of a double standard recusing yourself is the only appropriate step for you to take," wrote NLPC President Peter Flaherty. The foundation is devoted to ethics in government.

A Lieberman spokeswoman said the Connecticut Democrat will not step down as chairman during the hearings, which will begin Jan. 24 in the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee.

"Senator Lieberman has pledged to hold a fair hearing but has also pledged to hold an aggressive hearing," spokeswoman Leslie Phillips said, calling the conflict-of-interest contention "not a valid criticism."

"He has demonstrated his independence from Enron and thinks people should judge him for his actions," she said.

About one-third of congressional Democrats are members of the New Democrat Network that Mr. Lieberman founded in 1996 with Sen. John B. Breaux of Louisiana and Simon Rosenberg, a former aide in the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign. Arthur Andersen, Enron's auditing firm, contributed $20,000 to the New Democrat Network in 2001.

Enron was one of the generous corporate sponsors of the Senate Democrats' exclusive suites for power players at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles in 2000. It also underwrote a "Mardi Gras Goes Hollywood" party for Mr. Breaux at a Paramount Studios backlot during the convention.

Two Texas Democrats, Reps. Ken Bentsen and Sheila Jackson-Lee, are the leading House recipients of Enron campaign donations since 1989 with $42,750 and $38,000, respectively.

"Are [Democrats] prepared to bash Enron for its influence peddling when Sheila Jackson-Lee and Ken Bentsen are two of its biggest campaign recipients? That should be a fun debate," said a House Republican aide.

Another challenge for Democrats is to investigate the Bush administration's ties to Enron Corp. aggressively enough to get credit for the story while avoiding personal attacks against a popular wartime president.

"It'd better be fair," said Democratic strategist James Carville. "If they go out and act like a bunch of idiots and start shooting watermelons, it'll be bad."

He was referring to Rep. Dan Burton, Indiana Republican, who in 1994 tried to re-enact the suicide of former Clinton aide Vince Foster by firing a .38-caliber handgun into a pumpkin.

Lieberman spokesman Dan Gerstein said a probe that gets bogged down in politics would cause a backlash with the public.

"If you're excessively partisan, it can hurt your credibility," Mr. Gerstein said. "He's committed to doing this in a nonpartisan way. Aggressive, comprehensive and fair — that's the only way to do this."

While Democrats don't want to be perceived as going overboard in their investigations of the Enron bankruptcy, they do want to portray themselves as fighting for workers' rights and to cast Republicans as beholden to big business. Some Democrats say they are already chasing a story that is being driven by the media.

"If the Democrats didn't do anything, the press would uncover all the [administration´s] ties with Enron," said a senior House Democratic leadership aide. "There's no way you could stop this. This is an investigation that's going to be led by the press more than the Hill."

Since 1989, about 73 percent of Enron's $5.8 million in campaign contributions went to Republicans and 27 percent to Democrats. Mr. Carville said Democrats come out ahead politically in that equation.

"It'll hurt them 27 percent and the Republicans 73 percent," Mr. Carville said. "I'll take that. I'll win that election."

Enron was the 12th-largest contributor to the Bush presidential campaign.

President Clinton in 1997 got involved with Enron's attempt to undertake a $3 billion power-plant project in India. But the senior House Democratic aide said comparisons between the Clinton and Bush administrations' relationships with Enron do not trouble incumbent Democrats.

"There might be a downside for Clinton people, but they're not up for re-election," the staffer said. "If the Republicans want to trade live bodies for dead ones, that's OK with us."

A Bush administration official said Senate Democrats will be taking "a huge risk" if they combine partisan investigations into Enron with a pattern of blocking the administration's agenda.

The official noted that Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, South Dakota Democrat, already started the year with a "partisan" speech on the economy. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, will give a speech today in Washington in which he is expected to call for freezing a portion of the administration's $1.35 trillion tax cut.

"If the contrast is an administration that's trying to get things done in a bipartisan way, while fighting a war, it's a heck of a contrast in an election year," the Bush official said. "They risk looking like a partisan group of politicians who are on a witch hunt."
washtimes.com