SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (155730)1/16/2002 2:12:53 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan, Re: "You appear to be blissfully unaware that "classic" Athlon suffered from single data rate chipsets, its lack of on-chip cache, and 100mhz FSB - big performance problems when compared to an otherwise similar chip with DDR chipset support, 133mhz FSB and on-chip cache."

So if you're so confident, why don't you show me a few benchmarks that prove that the 1.4GHz Athlon scored 60% faster than the Athlon 1GHz? Or how about you try to defend any of the claims from that bogus marketing performance chart? Do you have a problem backing up your confident assertions?

wbmw



To: Dan3 who wrote (155730)1/16/2002 2:31:17 PM
From: Charles Gryba  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan, you are leaving yourself open for wbmw to completely destroy yours and milo's argument about hammer being 3x 1Ghz Athlon in performance. I'll let you reconsider your post.

C


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News