Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (9441)	1/16/2002 2:36:38 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

You first. You ducked ALL my questions. Don't break any pots now. Edit- you may have forgotten there were questions, or you may have thought saying "I'm right because this book I believe in is right was an answer". Well, if that really is your answer, just say so. Otherwise see bolded questions: I NOTICE that you think only effects need a cause. Why you accept that as a truism I've no idea. You presume God is not physical- I assume you haven't actually run laboratory tests on that- correct me if I'm wrong. I know- you answered this one based on that book you believe in I suspect you believe Jesus was a part of God, if you accept that than God was able to become physical- if you accept that Jesus while carnate was also part of God. How you reconcile that I do not know. No doubt you have an intricate tap dance for that, that calles for more presumed propositions. Why do things that are NOT physical not needed causes? Where did that come from? I will tell you- from the gossamer air. And how do you know the universe is physical only? More tests or more air? There are more problems, but that will do pig, that will do.