Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doren who wrote (31857)	1/16/2002 4:02:40 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 213182

Apple should drop all references to MHz from all documentation. I mean, really, who cares? In the end there are only three speeds: too slow, fast enough, and "whoah!". More information than that is pointlessly confusing. Nobody cares how fast the processor in their DVD player runs.

To: Doren who wrote (31857)	1/16/2002 4:19:38 PM
From: OrionX	Respond to of 213182

"You experts cannot even agree that a compareable machine exists." Doren, I'm the first one to agree a comparably priced Wintel machine exists and probably for a few dollars less too. However, I'm sure you would agree there's more involved that the mere physical components when comparing Apples to Wintels. The whole integration of H/W and S/W applications is by far the primary aspect anyone should be looking at. If a person is satisfied with what they can do on an Apple or Wintel, so be it. However, from my perspective both machines are not created equal.