Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (155754)	1/16/2002 5:06:20 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Jozef, Re: "Neither did (or should I say does) Itanium. I am not too oprimistic about Windows support for any 64bit CPU prior to the next major revision (not XP servers, one after that)." Windows XP 64-bit is expected later this year with full Itanium support. Re: "However, a sufficient 64 bit Windows support for hammer is a fraction of the effort needed for Itanium, and this fraction is even smaller because MSFT can leverage a lot that has been done for Itanium." I think you may soon realize two things. The first is that MSFT will be able to leverage very little from Itanium for Hammer (the architectures are simply too different), and second, building a Hammer OS will be harder than some seem to think. wbmw