SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (46558)1/16/2002 5:57:20 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
"Over-the-top" Arctic pipeline seeks support
By Jeffrey Jones

CALGARY, Alberta, Jan 16 (Reuters) - Executives behind an ambitious plan for a C$12.5 billion ($7.8 billion) pipeline to tap both Alaska and northern Canada natural gas filed details with regulators on Wednesday while admitting they lacked key support from major producers, governments and native groups.

Arctic Resources Co., a company backed by private Texas investors, wants to build a 2,710-km (1,680-mile) line to Alberta from Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, giving southern Canada and the U.S. mainland access to the vast reserves.

The pipeline is known as the ``over-the-top'' route because it would be constructed under the Beaufort Sea, connecting reserves in the Mackenzie Delta area of Canada's Northwest Territories before heading south to Edmonton, Alberta.

Arctic Resources chairman Forrest Hoglund said he was well aware the pipeline, which would be 100 percent funded by debt and wholly owned by a native-controlled firm, so far lacked the support enjoyed by competitors planning separate lines in Canada and Alaska.

But, at a news conference after the company filed a preliminary information package with Canada's National Energy Board, the former Exxon executive predicted the pipeline's merits would eventually win over the key players.

Those include the major producers, which he said would enjoy cheaper tolls, and aboriginal peoples, who could expect long-term economic benefits through ownership.

``We certainly anticipate that those major companies both in Alaska and in Canada will join our consortium because it is going to end up being so attractive to them to do it,'' he said.

Former Ottawa politician Harvie Andre is also a backer of the proposal, which faces stiff competition in the race to ship Arctic natural gas south.

Last week, Imperial Oil Ltd. (Toronto:IMO.TO - news), Shell Canada Ltd. (Toronto:SHC.TO - news), Conoco Inc. (NYSE:COC - news) and Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE:XOM - news) jumped into an early lead by starting work on applications for a Mackenzie Valley Pipeline, which would ship up to 1 billion cubic feet a day from their Mackenzie Delta reserves.

That C$4 billion proposal has the support of most aboriginal groups along the route, which would have one-third ownership. It could be in service by 2007 or 2008.

Meanwhile, Prudhoe Bay producers BP Plc (quote from Yahoo! UK & Ireland: BP.L), Phillips Petroleum Co. (NYSE:P - news) and Exxon Mobil are studying a more expensive plan to ship their gas along the Alaska Highway through the state and Yukon and into Alberta.

Canada's Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. and its partners, which have a 25-year-old regulatory approval, have submitted a proposal to Alaska producers, but have yet to reveal details.

Arctic Resources said its pipeline, which would eventually ship up to 5.2 billion cubic feet a day, would carry Mackenzie Delta gas first in 2007, then Alaska supply in 2008.

Shipping gas from both regions in one pipeline would mean lower tolls and higher returns for producers, Hoglund said.

Alaska lawmakers passed legislation last year that essentially forced any pipeline to be built through the state, a situation Hoglund said was not worrisome.

``We anticipate that Alaska is going to want to develop their resources, this is the only economic way to do it, so we feel they'll change that. We're not sure it would stand up in an international court of law anyway, but I don't think we'll ever have to test that,'' he said.

Arctic Resources executives said the 100 percent debt structure mirrored that used in municipal infrastructure projects such as bridges and toll roads, and would be supported by the vast gas reserves in the north.

($1 equals $1.60 Canadian)



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (46558)1/17/2002 8:04:28 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Andersen to top insurance limits

January 16, 2002

(Reuters) — You can only insure against so much, and it looks like embattled accounting firm Andersen will go way over its limit.

Andersen probably doesn't have enough insurance to cover the expected blockbuster payouts from settling lawsuits over its handling of Enron Corp.'s audit, experts say.

Andersen has a maximum of $500 million in professional liability coverage in the commercial market, insurance sources say, plus funds held in several self-owned Bermuda insurance entities.

That may not be enough to cover possibly massive payouts Andersen may have to make in settling Enron-related suits. Enron investors—who lost almost $80 billion as the energy trader collapsed—have targeted Andersen, along with Enron executives, in a number of suits charging they misrepresented Enron's financial dealings.

``Typically, there's a limited amount of insurance available for accounting firms, and they are largely self-insured,'' said Mark Cheffers, who runs www.accountingmalpractice.com, which gives advice to accountants to prevent them from being sued. Andersen's exposures could be 10 to 100 times its outside insurance coverage, Cheffers said, estimating its third-party coverage at no more than $300 million.

Any large settlements could put the accounting firm under huge financial pressure, and impoverish its partners.

``Who will pay for this? The partners, probably,'' Rickard Jorgensen, president of Jorgensen & Company, a specialist professional liability agency in Maywood, New Jersey, told Reuters. ``They themselves will pay for early litigation costs and so on out of day-to-day cash flow.''

After that, Andersen will look to its limited insurance coverage.

Accountants, fearing lawsuits targeting ``deep pockets'', are generally reticent about their insurance arrangements. Andersen did not return calls on the subject.

Insurance sources say that Andersen has a large deductible, meaning it pays the first few million dollars of claims itself.

Andersen augments coverage from insurers with a series of ''captive'' insurance companies in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, sources said, and possibly some further reinsurance or ''finite risk'' arrangements, which are basically offshore funds set up to smooth losses.

``These captives have been funded over years, and they probably have the resources to fund a lot of losses,'' said Jorgensen.

Even so, that may not cover Andersen's exposures.

Record pay-outs

Payouts on Enron-related lawsuits could set records, reflecting the largest ever U.S. bankruptcy. It previously paid large amounts for far smaller cases.

Andersen paid out $110 million to settle an accounting fraud lawsuit over its auditing of bankrupt appliance maker Sunbeam Corp. in May last year, without admitting fault or liability. It also paid out $75 million to settle a suit relating to Waste Management Inc. in 1998, part of a $220 million overall settlement.

This year Andersen also faces scrutiny, and possible payouts, for its work as auditor for Australian insurer HIH Insurance, which collapsed last year with a $2.5 billion shortfall in claims reserves, making it the largest bankruptcy in Australia.

Rival accountants have also fared badly. Ernst & Young paid out $335 million in late 1999 to settle shareholder suits related to accounting fraud at Cendant Corp.

Shareholders lost some $30 billion in that case, as measured by Cendant stock's fall from its record high to its bottom. PricewaterhouseCoopers last year paid out $55 million for a suit related to software firm MicroStrategy Inc.

Undercovered

The settlements have reduced the amount of insurance professional services firms can buy in the commercial market, as insurers shy away from huge losses. Traditionally, accountants would go to Lloyd's of London insurance market to set rates for their coverage. Brokers would then fill out the coverage in layers using insurers such as Chubb Corp. , Ace Ltd. and XL Capital.

Now reinsurers tend to exclude the ``big five'' accountants on reinsurance contracts, market sources say, leaving the firms to construct their own coverage with the help of brokers such as Aon Corp.

Aon helped accountants set up captive insurers in Bermuda some years ago, such as Professional Asset Indemnity Ltd., which accountants used to pool some of their risks. All the major accountants also have individual captives, sources say, although it impossible to know how much they cover.

If all those insurance sources are exhausted, exposure will revert to Andersen's partners, who usually are liable up to the value of their equity stake in the firm, under Andersen's limited liability partnership structure.

That still may not enough to cover a settlement, which could run into billions of dollars. It is not known how much money Andersen, a private firm with $9 billion in annual revenues, has on its balance sheet.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (46558)1/17/2002 8:15:26 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Stocks: Are Expectations too rosy?

Dr. Sung Won Sohn
Chief Economic Officer
Wells Fargo & Co.
(612) 6677498

January 14, 2002

drsohn.com

<<...After the worst setback in corporate profits since 1938, earnings are projected to jump in 2002. Corporate profits are determined by two factors: volume and margins. The best measure of volume is industrial production, not economic growth (chart 6). As inventories are rebuilt, production will rise faster than economic growth. The lack of pricing power will be a problem, but margins can still rise due to a slower rate of increase in wages and salaries; this is exactly what happened after the 1991 recession.

The market has already factored in healthy economic rebound and rosy earnings; the market is somewhat overvalued and some disappointments are likely. For example, about 60 percent of the increase in profits in 2002 is supposed to come from the tech sector which doubled in price since the bottom on September 21. The sales and earnings in the tech sector may not match the expectation of the market.

Aside from the strength of economic recovery and rich valuations, there are other risks including energy costs, Japan, etc. Unlike the 1990s when the bulls punched through all the barriers, the market now is more sensitive to the surrounding economic and political environment...>>



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (46558)1/17/2002 8:33:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Some Good Energy Articles In Technology Review...

techreview.com