SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (141775)1/16/2002 7:01:49 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1585089
 
This is a great point. The media would have us believe that Hitler and Gingrich sprouted from the same seed.

They did....however, Hitler is an example of one that went off the deep end.


Hitler's main points where extreme nationalism, hatred of the Jews and other "inferior" people, and aggressive expansion of the state both in terms of its power within the country, and by invading other countries.

Gingrich did not focus on nationalism, or against particular ethnic or religious groups. He did not support wars of conquest and he aimed to reduce the role of the federal government. If you examine their ideas and actions they are directly opposed in many areas. In no significant area is Hitler just a more extreme or "off the deep end" form of Gingrich. In some ways Hitler is closer to someone like Ted Kennedy who would have more power at the level of the central government, and less in the states (laander in Germany) or individuals, the exact opposite of Gingrich's main theme.

Tim



To: tejek who wrote (141775)1/16/2002 8:04:54 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1585089
 
And its not the media that perpetuates that belief, its political scientists and political philosophers....and they are right.

This statement is pure and utter nonsense. There is no connection whatsoever between the leanings of Newt Gingrich versus those of Hitler or other extremists.