AMERICAN TALIBAN - A SUPERIOR PRODUCT OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
By: William Kaliher
As any human capable of comparative reasoning knows, John Walker, Monica Lewinski, Richard Ramirez, Joe Conason, and the Puerto Rican Day Parade criminals are products of the Democrat Party. It's doubtful if Democrat leadership has enacted a single law that didn't have the underlying design of crippling American culture and debasing the citizen. John Walker, the traitor, is actually superior to what Liberal Democrat leadership wants for America.
I don't excuse any of these Democrat spawn for their crimes, lack of knowledge, morality or character, but I do blame people who voted for liberal Democrat politicians for their very creation. I also acknowledge a secondary blame for most Republican voters. Republicans didn't vote for the people who created the policies that formed these deviants. Instead they continually voted for candidates that lacked the guts to make an issue of these policies. The idea of "my candidates don't attain the level of perversion the Democrats do," is a hollow excuse under close scrutiny. Despite my disgust with John Walker, I can make a halfway valid argument in his defense.
Our system, for the past seventy years, has been constantly managed by far left-wing Democrats. Every single Democrat initiative, although gilded to look good, has harmed America. With the dominance of three anti-American socialist television networks, newspapers and magazines, there was little voice to stall the destruction of American culture. If we examined our country's leadership as we would a business, we'd realize it would have been bankrupted years ago. The comparative devastation of America by political leadership has been worse than had AT&T reduced our telephone system to the state where we were again using the telegraph. Yet, with government we don't make such comparisons and we let management continue to debase our culture and humanity. A cursory look at what happened to our society via government interference during the past seventy years will reveal what led to John Walker and these other beasts.
1.We have script instead of money.
A. We have an un-elected czar, Alan Greenspan, controlling our economy. He protects the super-rich, not the steelworker, waitress or non-corporate farmer.
B. We have an IRS that can prosecute us via unconstitutional edicts and demand we provide evidence to be used against us.
2. It takes two wage earners for most families to survive.
3. Most of the rules we live under are no longer Constitutional.
A. Judges make rulings we must follow.
B. Mandates dictate what local officials have to do.
4. Large corporations rarely make money without conspiring with government officials.
5. Each year the people who graduate are less educated.
A. Less history is taught.
B. Fewer citizenship or governmental courses are provided. What student knows why this country was founded and its basis?
C. Religion, and hence, morality has been banned from the classroom.
6. Religious thought is frowned on by leaders and ignored by the liberal media.
7. The police are used as much to protect criminals as to prosecute them.
A. Ask yourself what would happen if you shot and killed someone for hooking a kid on drugs, or enticing a girl into prostitution, or abusing a child in 1929 versus doing the same today
B. If you have an unruly child, ask why you could actually help that child before FDR and why you can't today.
8. The patriots that risked their lives, health and wealth to gain freedom of speech are now ignored while the media tells kids Larry Flynt is a role model for ensuring free speech.
9. The government pays people not to work and to have babies.
10. Two parent families have declined and illegitimacy is acceptable.
11. Homosexuality is pushed and traditional families discouraged.
12. The majority of television programs are designed to further debase society.
13. National leadership doesn't think enough of our nation to provide a border or legitimate immigration policy.
14. The public is so apathetic, unenlightened, ignorant, stupid, or perverted, that some twenty percent of them could ensure someone less noble than Caligula could hold office for eight years. (If there's a person alive that thinks Caligula's horse had less business being a Roman Senator than Kennedy, Lott, Leahy, Jeffords or the swine from Michigan have being American Senators, please e-mail me your reasoning.)
Now we have a kid named John Walker. And from here I'll surmise. I don't know what kind of parents he had. With television, schools and the media undermining traditional values, the influence of parents may be inconsequential. My guess is John Walker wasn't a bad kid. He subconsciously knew something was amiss in his life and our culture. He probably wasn't taught the reasons for this country's founding. John Walker had no idea of what taxation without representation meant. He had no idea what the Revolutionary War soldiers fought for. Walker had no idea of the enlightenment and scientific advancements his Western culture had produced and provided the world. He lived in a world that shunned Christianity and it's rules, but encouraged atheism and/or various pagan beliefs. He lived in a world where Caligula's horse's ass would have provided more depth of thinking and national loyalty than the Congressional leaders he was exposed to. My guess is, Walker had enough of what made Western civilization great within him, he rejected the hedonistic appeals of atheism and paganism. Still, he knew this world he was in was wrong, immoral and undisciplined. Walker became a Moslem to fill the voids Democrat voters gave him through liberalism.
There's not much difference in the two religions of Islam and Satanism, but there are a few positives with Islam. Walker could have just as easily adopted Satanic practices and now be on trial for sacrificing a human. In this culture, under liberal Democrat tutelage, Walker might well have made the more noble choice. He had the guts to put his life at risk for his ill guided beliefs. Risking one's life is something no liberal would ever do.
John Walker has placed the socialist media in a large dilemma. They want to protect him for his anti-American stance, but he's not a coward. He's not really one of them despite his earlier indoctrination. The difference can be seen in their treatment of Jane Fonda and John Walker. Why the solid left-wing protection of one traitor and only haphazard protection for the other? Will a trial for John Walker force a trial for Fonda? Can the left's media spin make their treasonous acts seem different?
Regardless of the media spin, we know Walker had enough internal integrity to reject the illness of liberalism. The shame is, Walker was never provided a view of the positives of Western civilization and Christianity to choose from when searching for his moral compass. We can only weep that liberalism provided John Walker nothing and his search led to the abomination known as Islam. What might a John Walker have accomplished had he known the comparative positives of our Constitution, Judeo-Christian beliefs, and capitalist system? Yes, John Walker deserves the death sentence, but so do his creators. |
