Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Covered Calls for Dummies Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (3273)	1/17/2002 2:02:55 PM
From: Dominick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5205

I see what you mean when you look at it in terms of percentages. I was only looking at the risk in terms of dollars and cents. I view the risk level associated with calendar spreads as significantly higher than covered calls. Would that be because the repair strategies could become quite involved by not owing the stock? Dominick

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (3273)	1/17/2002 6:16:50 PM
From: Dan Duchardt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5205

Uncle Frank, You observation about the higher potential of losing all your money on a LEAPS call as compared to owning the stock is absolutely correct. However, in making a comparison of the calendar (same strike different month) or diagonal (different strike and different month) spreads to a conventional CC, the percentage loss is not always the significant factor. It depends on what you do with the money you "saved" buying a LEAPS instead of the underlying stock. If you put that money at risk, buying LEAPS to control more shares that you could afford to buy, that is playing with fire. But if you only buy LEAPS to control the shares you can afford, and put the rest of that money in a safe place (fixed interest investments of some sort), then the LEAPS affords greater protection to the downside. Losing $0.80 per share is always preferable to losing $1.00 per share if you are talking about the same number of shares. And the nice thing about the LEAPS is that for the second dollar drop, and the third, and so on, the ratio improves. There is a tendency to think of going DITM for these long LEAPS in this strategy to minimize the time premium paid. IMHO opinion, that is a bad idea because it negates much of the benefit of buying the LEAPS. Moderately ITM LEAPS are much cheaper and can still be chosen to assure a profit if the stock goes up, with the added benefit that you can afford to roll down the LEAPS to a lower strike later on if the stock falls at a lower cost than buying the low strike LEAPS to start out. Dan