SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tommaso who wrote (144377)1/17/2002 2:14:00 PM
From: reaper  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
<<Do you see FNM as a sort of higher-class version of PVN?>>

Lower-class, actually, given their irresponsible leverage, anti-competitive business practices, feeding at the public trough (FNM & FRE "earnings" are for all practical purposes a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to their shareholders, under-written by the Feds), and their propagation of the myth that you "own" your house when you have a mortgage against it for 95% of its (inflated) value.

The existence of FNM and FRE are going to RUIN people financially when they can't make their house payments; equity built up over decades will vanish. PVN was just a little spec on the ass of an elephant that didn't hurt anybody except their stupid shareholders.

FNM & FRE will both be sub-$10 when this is over and Warren Buffett will be using his vast personal wealth to shore up their balance sheets.

Cheers



To: Tommaso who wrote (144377)1/17/2002 2:35:29 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<<Is the idea that a lot of mortgage loans will be going bad?>>

That's a big part of it. The rest of the story is that if rates rise, their refi biz and their new housing loan business will slow, whacking their revenues. But the main reason is rising unemployment/mortgage defaults.