Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Tenzel who wrote (25193)	1/17/2002 3:00:44 PM
From: P. Ramamoorthy	Respond to of 27311

Jacques, Re.:"...low volume cited in the initial order, it is non-specific as to the type of battery involved..." Agree. No evidence of phosphate cell production yet. Waiting for a report on NI plant status. Ram

To: Jacques Tenzel who wrote (25193)	1/17/2002 3:05:34 PM
From: Greg McDaniel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Jacques, in looking at the pogo web site I see the specifications for the battery as "Lithium polymer(3-4 days standby, 2-4 hrs talk time"). This may give you a clue or not. It does not seem like a lot to me...Or am I expecting too much? Here is the link to specs... carphonewarehouse.com

To: Jacques Tenzel who wrote (25193)	1/17/2002 3:28:39 PM
From: Tickertype	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

On the cc last august they said the phosphate version only has different chemistry while the mechanical aspects of producing the cells are the same as before. No change to the equipment was needed. If that's the case, I would think the yields will be similar regardless of which version they make. - T -

To: Jacques Tenzel who wrote (25193)	1/17/2002 5:03:45 PM
From: hcirteg	Respond to of 27311

Jacques- I agree totally with your assessment. Please understand that my recent optimisim is based more on shae and option buying trading patterns than any fundamental specific reason. The news today was at least a start of an explanation of the increased trading activity. More substantial news is indeed needed to sustain any meaningful move north. I expect to hear that news and remain very, very long. HC

To: Jacques Tenzel who wrote (25193)	1/22/2002 10:32:05 AM
From: Jacques Tenzel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

January 22, 2002 09:31 Valence Technology Announces Third Quarter 2002 Release Date AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 22, 2002--Valence Technology Inc. (Nasdaq:VLNC), a leader in the development and commercialization of Lithium-ion polymer rechargeable batteries, today announced that it will release its third quarter 2002 operating results after the market closes on Thursday, Feb. 14, 2002. The company announced that it will conduct a conference call to discuss the results and to provide a comprehensive progress report on its key milestones. The call will be held on Feb. 14, 2002, at 5:00 p.m. EDT (2:00 p.m. PDT). The broadcast will be hosted on the company's Web site located at www.valence.com. Participants should allow approximately 15 minutes prior to the call's start time to visit the site and download any streaming media software needed to listen to the Internet broadcast. An online archive of the broadcast will be available approximately four hours following the live call and will remain available for 30 days. About Valence Technology Inc. Valence is a leader in the development and commercialization of Lithium-ion polymer rechargeable batteries. Valence has more than 790 issued and pending patents worldwide, including 284 issued in the United States. Valence operates facilities in Austin, Texas, Henderson, Nev., and Mallusk, Northern Ireland. Valence is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol VLNC. Valence can be found on the Internet at www.valence.com. Forward-Looking Statements The information contained herein includes "forward-looking statements." The company cautions readers not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those described herein, for the reasons, among others, discussed in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.