SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (68139)1/17/2002 7:30:27 PM
From: semiconengRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
I'm glad you clarified that only "line yield" is in the high 90's. I was scratching my head on what happened to the other 6 million CPU's. <g>
Line Yield at >90% for world class fabs is nothing special.

True, but JS implied that line yield was >96%, not 90%.

Petz


Maybe I'm not expressing myself too well. As far as Semiconductor Manufacturing is concerned, line yield is pretty much viewed as a "so what", lower priority indicator, since all it tells you is that your Manufacturing Techs didn't drop the wafers, or your tools didn't mis-handle the wafers, or that you didn't have some process tool malfunction or misprocess (run the wrong tool recipe for example), the wafers so badly that it wasn't economically feasable to continue Procesing that particular wafer, or group of wafers, and they're scrapped.

While it may indicate how well your Manufacturing Technicians and Equipment Maintenance people are doing, it doesn't say anything about the Health of the Process, the Yield of the chips, or the Bin Splits that AMD gets out.

However if the people on this Thread (and Jerry) are concerned with how many wafers the Techs Dropped, or how many equipment malfunctions AMD's Fabs had, then it's a good indicator of that. I use it mostly to point out Training issues and improvements. So what it tells me, is that after several years of operation, AMD's Process Tools are being maintained, and AMD's workers know how to operate their Fab.

Nice information, but as I said....so what.

Semi



To: Petz who wrote (68139)1/19/2002 12:22:51 AM
From: milo_moraiRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Any interest here in UMC ? quote.yahoo.com