SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (16689)1/17/2002 8:20:37 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Look, that's not the way you make deals. You never offer more than you are willing to give, trade, whatever you call it. Deals are quid pro quos, this for that. When you make an offer, you may be willing to give more, but you never offer more than you intend to give.

If you offer $10,000 and the other side demands $90,000, you don't come back with $5,000. That's not the way the world works. It's an insult.

Israel offered all of Gaza and 95% of the West Bank. Arafat refused. OK. Now, Arafat knows that Israel intends to give AT LEAST all of Gaza and 95% of the West Bank. We all know that. Everyone knows that.

Now, Israel can't come back and offer less. It's an insult.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (16689)1/27/2002 5:27:29 AM
From: blankmind  Respond to of 281500
 
Nadine - i think you lose on this point - b/c Israel constantly says they'll pull of the "territories" if the Arabs meet certain conditions.

-My question, like most others, is who is Israel to be occupying Arab territory to begin with?

- If the Israeli gov't would say they're willing to give up a chunk of Jewish Land to the Arabs to achieve peace, then okay - but the Israel Gov't has never said this