Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (156186)	1/18/2002 3:10:18 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 186894

Ten - Re: "But then again, had AMD won the X-Box contract instead of Intel, Jerry and the AMDrhoids would be counting X-Box processors as PC processors. And they'd be more religious about it than us Intel-a-bees right now. ;-)" Amen, brother. Paul

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (156186)	1/18/2002 4:11:12 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

But then again, had AMD won the X-Box contract instead of Intel, Jerry and the AMDrhoids would be counting X-Box processors as PC processors. And they'd be more religious about it than us Intel-a-bees right now. ;-) Perhaps. I think that perhaps separate figures for "with X-Box" and "without X-Box" should be posted by anyone who wants to speculate as to Intel's market share and ASPs. The ASPs would obviously look nicer without including the X-Box sales. (but as long as they are not capacity constrained and as long as the X-Box chips sell for more then the cost of production, which they probably do, its still a bonus for Intel despite the lowered ASPs) Tim