SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VD's Model Portfolio & Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Vector1 who wrote (9129)1/18/2002 1:54:43 PM
From: tuck  Respond to of 9719
 
V1,

Obviously, you follow this closely, and you seem to have made a good entry. Seems to be a target rich environment for buying. In addition to the candidates already mentioned, I am trying to find reasons not to buy Curagen at these levels. Anybody? I think genomics and proteomics companies are simply out of favor; I can find no obvious bad news for Curagen. I think the pendulum may have swung too far in favor of old-fashioned biologics companies.

OTOH, I can't find news, period. I can't dig up the abstract at the ACG site that was supposed to have Curagen's preclinical IBD data. Bayer is too secretive (or unproductive) to publish abstracts, the ABGX deal is too young for results, and I can only get teeny clues about Glaxo and Genentech collaborations' results. Help! Looks like I'm reduced to listening to the November Robbie Stephens presentation by CEO Rothberg. I'll post anything of interest on the CRGN thread.

Cheers, Tuck



To: Vector1 who wrote (9129)2/7/2002 10:09:28 PM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9719
 
<< The big market is soft tissue infection for which Cidecin met its endpoint and Ceftriaxone is irrelevant. >>
Vector, do you think that CBST can file and NDA for STI alone, disregarding the CAP data? This would make the failed trial almost an nonevent.

I sure hope so since I bought a few shares today.