SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (16756)1/18/2002 2:15:51 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
>> Why the Muslims Misjudged Us
Victor Davis Hanson<<

city-journal.org

Excerpt: "Israel does not really know to what degree the
Palestinian authorities have a real constituency, because the
people of the West Bank themselves do not know
either—inasmuch as they cannot debate one another on domestic
television or campaign on the streets for alternate policies. Mr.
Arafat assumed power by Western fiat; when he finally was allowed
to hold real and periodic elections in his homeland, he simply
perpetuated autocracy—as corrupt as it is brutal."



To: Ilaine who wrote (16756)1/18/2002 5:15:18 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
Don't think I haven't handled cases where the parties have threatened each other's lives.

I was not speaking of threats, but actual violence. I suspect that under the rubric of the American legal system, actual acts of arson and violence would reshape the parameters of the negotiations. But you still didn't answer my question, so you tell me.

The people of Israel and Palestine have been stuck in an antagonistic posture for too long. They need closure. They need to be able to move on with their lives.

Very rationally spoken. Unfortunately, it's not just a matter of hostility. I don't think you have realized the full extent of the irrationality you're dealing with in Arafat and the Arab ethos he represents and has fully internalized. This ethos is exquisitely tuned to matters of pride, honor, loyalty and face. It's very badly tuned to matters of honesty, reason or compromise.

For example, it was the Arab ethos that caused Nasser to tell King Hussein in a private phone call (which the Israeli tapped, which is how we know) on the second day of the Six Day War that his air force was in good shape and fighting back hard. In reality, his air force had been completely destroyed in the first ten minutes of the war, but he couldn't admit this even in private. This misinformation caused King Hussein to take some decisions he later regretted.

Oslo would have worked if Arafat had been rational. For that matter, Munich would have worked too, if Hitler had been the rational man that Chamberlin took him for. Chamberlin couldn't bring himself to realize that Hitler's mindset was totalitarian and dedicated to the creation of the Thousand Year Reich. Similarly, Oslo's architects could not see that Arafat sees himself as the second coming of Saladin, who will destroy the second Crusader Kingdom -- Israel -- just as Saladin destroyed the first.



To: Ilaine who wrote (16756)1/20/2002 3:32:38 AM
From: SirRealist  Respond to of 281500
 
I still don't think the divorce analogy works. There's dead kids on both sides, which does not help fulminating hatred dissipate easily.

In a divorce, both sides wish to get on with their lives w/o losing too much property or control over their lives.

In this conflict, there are many who want only revenge on someone they never loved to begin with.