Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (219930)	1/18/2002 5:18:36 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

CONSERVATIVE LOATHING OF THE CLINTONS IT REALLY SAYS MORE ABOUT THE LIBERALS By: William Kaliher Liberals questioning why people despise the Clintons tells far more about liberal ills, than about those who detest the Clintons. For the past nine years the media's socialist spokesmen have followed many denials of bias by immediately moaning about conservatives hating the Clintons. The fact that any human doesn't despise cancer, cheating, the Clintons, Nazis or people that torture cats reflects negatively on the tolerant person not the hater. Any admirers of Clinton and most liberals should beware that a serious and uncomfortable bout of introspection could occur while reading this article. Think about it. It's not just that I or anyone else hates or loathes Clinton, it goes much deeper. Hate and loathing aren't nearly strong enough words to qualify what any normal, well- read and well-adjusted person feels for the Clintons. More horrific than any hate for such semi-human grime is the fact too many otherwise decent Democrats are so brainwashed they don't see the selfishness, seediness or smell the oozing, infectious pus that weeps from the Clintons.. Liberals, try to think this through a moment. Kaliher, is a firebrand combination of conservative and libertarian. He absolutely hates Clinton without reservation. Yet, while totally disagreeing with the politics of Jimmy Carter, LBJ and JFK, he does not hate those people. He dislikes some things about them, but admires Mr. Carter and his family in many ways. Think about the comparison. Most conservatives would be honored to have Mr. Carter in their homes. Beyond partisan politics there is little Mr. Carter might ask us to do we would not try to accommodate. However, we wouldn't want Bill and Hillary Clinton in our yards unless there was an extreme need for fertilizer. Whereas I'd respect hearing Mr. Carters opinions and thoughts on many subjects, I would have to be forcibly immobilized to listen to Clinton. Whereas I'd tolerate, if not enjoy, talking with LBJ or JFK, I'd feel soiled and in need of a bath if I was unfortunate enough to be in Clinton's presence Now liberal, those statements are truthful so it's obvious conservatives and libertarians don't hate just because of politics. They don't hate as do politically correct liberals but only disagree based on political philosophy. What's the difference? What do we know and see about the Clintons that you don't? What shocked and sickened a few popular liberals such as Christopher Hitchens and Chris Matthews? How did they maintain their ability to be offended by the gaudy, the petty, the unsavory, the criminal and the stench of corruption while you didn't? If you think about the series of crimes, deaths and amoral and immoral decisions committed by the Clintons over the past thirty-plus years in comparative terms you'll grasp why we respect and even appreciate many of our foes but loath the Clintons. So, if it's not the politics that promotes this revulsion toward Clinton, could it be the reality of the cruelty he's inflicted on so many innocent people? Could it be the laws he's broken and ignored in his quest for personal power? Could it be that you have approved and we have disapproved of his rapes? Perhaps we more than frown at how he undermined justice in the Billy Dale and Paula Jones cases? Perhaps we don't believe in launching international attacks that kill and maim people so we can keep our latest tawdry affair off the front pages? Has something happened to you and your liberal brethren you need to fix? It's true that if one lays down with dogs they get up with fleas. Most liberals and the Democrat party are infested. You better listen to those few liberals that tried to warn you. Right now you're mired in the filth you have accepted. You have worshiped and supported a demon worse than any slave master, a ghoul lower than Stalin, a man with less morality and integrity than Charles Manson. Wake up, we have reason to laugh at you and give you disrespect at every turn. You have the Clintons smeared all over you and either you can't smell it or you aren't smart enough to scrape that dog poop from your shoes or your party. William Kaliher is a free-lance political columnist and a staff writer for the Ether Zone. He can be reached at wkaliher@mindspring.com Published in the June 25, 2001 issue of Ether Zone. Copyright permitted with this message intact.' tom watson tosiwmee

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (219930)	1/18/2002 5:44:44 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

<<George W. Bush did his dim-bulb best to deflect attention>> LMAO. Great link, Pat...thx for bringing it to this board. Does this sum up the W campaign strategy, or what? We (in TX) saw this BS start many, many years ago. To package a lazy, spoiled, stupid drunk born 'of privilege' into a puppet for his Daddy's ego and fraudulent ambitions for the Bush estate. He doesn't need to pretend to be dumb. He is. He DOES need to pretend that he actually 'cares' <cough> about anyone but himself. He 'cares' that 'other people' lose money, jobs .. or their lives themselves? The fewer of 'us,' the better, is what I think Pop Bush + buddies believe...in their 'hearts of hearts.' They want to have to fck with aging baby boomers, btching about the costs of living ... and survival i.e. their buddy's premium pharmaceutical companies...and insurance companies...and oil companies/drillers ... The more of us who die 'young,' the better. Too damned many of us. bia