Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Gary Dobry Subpoenas 41 SI Aliases -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John who wrote (127)	1/19/2002 11:19:35 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 1136

John, you'll have to pardon my lack of knowledge on your post. My post was mainly directed at the subpoena which is typically used in a civil suit for discovery. I made no comment on the suit, itself, nor did I intend to. I see from your profile that this is your first post in 4 years? Or have the rest just been deleted??? :))

To: John who wrote (127)	1/19/2002 4:13:31 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 1136

That's how Pugs would like for it to be seen. You are saying the subpoena is legally seen as part of the discovery process in the Marchese vs Dobry lawsuit? I'm mot sure what sort of legal mechanism exists for Marchese's attorney to oppose a subpoena in which his client isn't named. In addition, Dobry's trying to "prove" that we're all Marchese's "agents" or "employees", so for him to act on our behalf might be interpreted as tacit confirmation of Dobry's looney accusations. Marchese is, however, providing an affidavit for the Massachusetts Motion to Quash, and will be asked to do the same for the Washington action.