Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Corner Bay Silver (BAY.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (3074)	1/19/2002 4:10:39 PM
From: TheBusDriver	Respond to of 4409

bingo! <eom>

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (3074)	1/19/2002 5:23:11 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 4409

>pumpous, LOL. Was that deliberate? Of course, not. >Watching GT and Z at work reminds me of a pump and dump, >only in reverse. Well it sure looks like it. > I can't imagine there's enough people on these threads to > affect the stock price of a legitimate operation like BAY. Exact. That is what I once meant when I said "They do not know what forces are behind BAY". It is not coming from SI.

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (3074)	1/20/2002 1:30:22 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4409

Canuck Dave sez: ...I think I'm seeing patterns that aren't really there. So nice of you to admit it! And what's the "reverse called now?" Dump then pump? ONE: I've never owned it, so I have no shares to dump...sorry to ruin your little scenario at the gitgo here...NOT... TWO: I'll NEVER pump it because I don't believe in the story...it's all built on the *M-Y-T-H* that silver is in short supply. It simply isn't, and BAY isn't needed to come on line and save the silver world from its CURRENT oversupply fundamentals. And here's another newsflash fer ya: The pre-feasibility study was claiming profitability at silver $5.25 price...(I've got the link if you need it...but prefer you do your own homework) and subsequent "guidance" has lowered that to $4.78ish... Now trader Joe, just who is it you claim is "dumping on BAY's "rosy" future here? I didn't issue either of those two POS numbers Then here comes CroupierClaude...he's split the difference and is claiming $5.00 is going to be the nice round POS feas number in the yet to be released bankable feas study... Heck, that's not even the conservative number released by the analysts. So if POS=$5.25 and that's the PUMP and the revised analyst says, nope, better make that POS $4.78...and that's the "dump" Then Claude splitting the difference at $5.00...what's that make him? THE PIMP???? YEEEEEEEEEhaw!!!! Cheers! marcos