To: Gary H who wrote (80924 ) 1/19/2002 5:52:46 PM From: IngotWeTrust Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116833 While I hear your 2 points, and CERTAINLY agree with you that the Franco component is sweet sweet sweet, I don't think I concur that the Franco deal is how NEM is going to lift the Normandy hedges. That isn't someone one does overnight, nor do they have to. Delivering production is a normal way of closing hedges. Remember, hedging isn't wrong, just the 9 written, naked calls to pay for one naked put is the out of whack "wrong headed" deriv strategy that I object to. As a former wheat farmer, soybean farmer, a cattle-rancher, and now a goldminer both lode as well as recycling goldminer, I firmly believe both in hedging as well as cash-forward contract inorder to achieve maximum return on dollar invested. Doesn't mean I go crazy and get 9:1 naked while I'm using the legit hedging game available at my local commodity brokerage down the street, or in now modern times, as close as my online hedging account. RE: Franco's Management...I may have a slightly different take than you there, as well. For starters, Franco Mgmt kicking out royalty checks is a "no brainer," management wise. I greatly suspect to see Franco Mgmt "reassignment within the new corporate tree" OR their "additional job duties" as assigned by their new bosses. The royalty game is one NEM is already participating in. There maybe a cost savings gleam in NEM's eye by buying out Franco's mgmt team and simply adding on another server and a junior accounting associate to do the grunt work. God help us if they grab one of Anderson's snot-nosed, too young to shave suits to replace Franco's mgmt team however...<g> Any comment?