Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JustTradeEm who wrote (11998)	1/20/2002 9:37:01 AM
From: quasi-geezer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45639

the Rams should be favored by 20 points against those birds ...

To: JustTradeEm who wrote (11998)	1/20/2002 1:43:40 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45639

<<Talk is cheap ... should have been 45 - 7 !!!>> they had two plays,a wide receiver around that had us napping(we are vulnerable to wiffy plays--but when opposition goes to them i know they are getting desperate) and a "oops,why did i do that" completion by McNabb to a Chicago Bear:).A-train evidently had his engine stolen:) And gees we even got to rest Troy. I watch the Rams/Packers with interest--but just don't think Packers have the defense to slow Rams down--so we should be in St.Louis next week in what should be a highly competitive game.We best watch the game films of Tampa Bay's solid victory over the Rams on Rams field. ESPN was rhasodizing how McNabb has stepped his game up a knotch since he has learned to scramble with priority to pass and looking downfield at all times. Now to go to philly.com and read those papers--hey maybe Bill Lyons will even be in a good mood:) PaxMax "Go Birds."