Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (6619)	1/20/2002 11:47:37 PM
From: isopatch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

Speaking of put/call indicators here's an interesting one: traders-talk.com Isopatch

To: russwinter who wrote (6619)	1/21/2002 12:33:11 AM
From: BirdDog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36161

Because after running the fleet so hard for the past two years, a significant amount of generation is slated to come off line in 2002 for repairs and refueling. I followed this discussion from a pointer on another thread. I'm no nuclear expert. However I have visited and worked at a nuclear plant during refueling. Something doesn't sound right about what this guy said. What I mean is that these Nuclear plants refuel at least once a year. During that refueling, they undergo maintenance, testing, inspection of everything. It sounds strange to me that a person would expect more outages this year than any other? Something isn't right? I could understand if he expects more down time due to wear from overloading? But, from what I saw, they always ran that plant I was at full load if they could. ? I don't mean to argue. Just trying to help.. BirdDog@OhHomeOnTheRange.com