Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (111214)	1/20/2002 2:22:13 PM
From: Ibexx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Art, if you do exactly the opposite of what is recommended in BARRON'S you'll generally be better off. Agreed generally that Barron's is frequently a good contrarian indicator, but it also offers a glimpse of WS insights on occasion. My posting of the Barron's article was intended to share the prevalent thoughts of those who move the market. My own long term decisions were never based on the big boyz's thinking, but short-term, information such as this should be useful to the options players (which many on this thread dabble as), traders, as well as the moaners who need a bit of hand-holding. Ibexx

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (111214)	1/20/2002 4:53:57 PM
From: idler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

I was a little surprised that Steven Milunovich of ML recommended Qualcomm. He's the guy that wrote a very negative investment report on the possible 3g market. I wonder where his enthusiasm is coming from?