SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Allen Furlan who wrote (13732)1/20/2002 5:57:13 PM
From: 249443  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78559
 
Allen, I have attempted to learn as much about the Calpine situation as I can. I have listened to the below Williams conference call a few times. The call is about 2-hours in length.

Previously, I had listened to Calpine's update conference call on operations -- caused by the Enron concern -- and had thought the call went well and management had credibility. Then I listened to the Williams call. There are a few questions pertaining to what Calpine & industry does vs. what Williams does -- and I decided Calpine had way to many risks for my tastes.

In my opinion, the Williams call is a must listen when assessing the Calpines, Dynegys, etc. Especially since you indicated that this would be a "conservative play".

williams.com
shareholder.com

Williams Update 2001 Webcast
Dec. 19, 2001 8:30 a.m. ET



To: Allen Furlan who wrote (13732)1/21/2002 1:20:46 AM
From: Softechie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78559
 
Mirant may have closely ties with Enron and have more exposure to the titanic while Calpine doesn't have much exposure to Enron. Actually it owes Enron money from buying power.

To answer Moody's downgrade and get back investment grade, Mirant only sold 60M shares at $13.70 while Calpine getting more than $2.5B from investment community. Now which one is better positioned for an upgrade from Moody's.