Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (220383)	1/20/2002 7:42:32 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Interesting, 'jlallen,' that you always must resort ... ... to diminishing other people by gender ... when all else fails. 'Going for the crotch.' -g- You do this in the courtroom, 'Counselor?' I've love to see it ... LMAO. 'Homos' (although as I recall you use much more 'pedestrian' -- rather, 'non-elitist' phraseology -g- -- 'I'll 'shame them' into SILENCE based on lurid references to 'getting any,' posts 'jlallen.' As if you actually believe that saying -- IN FRONT OF OTHERS -g- -- that 'bonnuss_in_austin' is 'too ugly' to be, what, 'given your permission? to have sexual relations? ... which makes her not only 'undersirable' to 'men,' but completely 'useless' in any 'way.' Here's a man who, first of all, has no idea of the gender of the Cyberspace alias, 'bonnuss_in_austin.' Secondly, 'jlallen' has no idea if the alias 'bonnuss_in_austin' has -- LMAO -- sorry; it's just too hilarious -- had sex in the past 15 minutes, 24 hours or 25 years -- and, <HA!> FURTHERMORE ... He has no idea what KIND of sex the alias, 'bonnuss_in_austin' engages in, if any ... F*k! It could be something KINKY!!! It could be with a spouse ... or the construction crew bisexual swinger remodeling the next-door neighbor's bathroom ... or with half the married members of the Baptist church two blocks away ... or ... LOL. Need I further elaborate? What you are doing in the post to which I respond, 'jlallen,' implies that women who don't 'defend themselves' on an investing message board site by 'asserting' something along the lines of, "Oh NO, 'jlallan!' I have sex!!! I like men!!!" ... have no right to post on SI. And especially, on boards that 'jlallen' likes to believe he 'controls.' Hey, 'jla:' GFY ... many more times than once ... in as many positions as you can imagine. Given your posting history, I doubt that you're very creative...i.e. 'Me on top. Ugh. I win.' hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha bia