SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doug R who wrote (40590)1/21/2002 3:41:45 AM
From: Warthog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 79459
 
doughR,

thanks for the notes on the IL/ACT/RR thingys.

could you look at CDIC as an IL/ACT/RR??

(if you get the chance)

thanks
wart



To: Doug R who wrote (40590)1/22/2002 12:14:36 AM
From: bdog  Respond to of 79459
 
bdog: no discernable ACT. possible IL violation as he is working too much. used to be at t1 but now energy level at l2. triangle formation looks like a white flag. trading dynamic is fading unless a straight line is drawn from the lows to a nearby pub to infuse a red hook. initial launch point pending...>g<

HAPPY NEW YEAR Y'ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hope you all had a fine set of holidays and i wish you all the best this year.

btiredog



To: Doug R who wrote (40590)1/22/2002 1:07:28 PM
From: phideaux754  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 79459
 
Doug,

Just returned from a family emergency to find your comments. Thanks. Of course, this will now produce a series of questions from me.

First one: I agree that 3/28 can't be an ACT because it gets violated numerous times by price bars as we move forward. The uptrend does a reset from mid October to mid November. Then another acceleration begins. Why isn't this an ACT? If it is, L2 looks to be 9/26.